AI / Model comparison

Compare AI models

Choose any two models to see their strengths, specifications and published benchmark results side by side.

Model A
Model B

Explore 26 models from 10 companies. Your selection is saved in the page link.

At a glanceGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3.8-Max
CompanyGoogleAlibaba Qwen
PositionFastFlagship
Best suited forMultimodal work at high volumeLong-context coding, documents and multimodal reasoning
Input context1,048,576 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Maximum output65,536 tokens131,072 tokens

Benchmark results

Percent score for the evaluated model run. The stronger result in each row is shaded.

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3.8-Max
Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub · Knowledge
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions95.4%gemini-3.8-flash · high92.3%qwen3.8-max-0902 · xhigh
SimpleQA VerifiedFactual questions69.7%gemini-3.8-flash · high47.3%qwen3.8-max-0902 · xhigh
Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub · Mathematics
OTIS AIMECompetition mathematics98.9%gemini-3.8-flash · high100.0%qwen3.8-max-0902 · xhigh
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Advanced mathematics68.4%gemini-3.8-flash · high65.6%qwen3.8-max-0902 · xhigh
FrontierMath Tier 4Research-level mathematics22.0%gemini-3.8-flash · high34.1%qwen3.8-max-0902 · xhigh
Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub · Reasoning
Chess PuzzlesChess problem solving61.0%gemini-3.8-flash · high40.0%qwen3.8-max-0902 · xhigh
Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub · Spatial
Furniture AssemblySpatial assembly reasoning31.7%gemini-3.8-flash · high20.0%qwen3.8-max-0902 · xhigh
LiveBench · Reasoning
Theory Of Mind76.9%gemini-3.8-flash-high78.8%qwen3.8-max
Zebra Puzzle98.2%gemini-3.8-flash-high100.0%qwen3.8-max
Spatial100.0%gemini-3.8-flash-high100.0%qwen3.8-max
Logic With Navigation82.0%gemini-3.8-flash-high74.0%qwen3.8-max
LiveBench · Coding
Code Generation73.2%gemini-3.8-flash-high71.8%qwen3.8-max
Code Completion71.7%gemini-3.8-flash-high73.9%qwen3.8-max
LiveBench · Agentic Coding
JavaScript72.7%gemini-3.8-flash-high77.3%qwen3.8-max
TypeScript40.0%gemini-3.8-flash-high56.7%qwen3.8-max
Python50.0%gemini-3.8-flash-high60.0%qwen3.8-max
LiveBench · Mathematics
AMPS Hard99.0%gemini-3.8-flash-high98.0%qwen3.8-max
Integrals With Game80.0%gemini-3.8-flash-high81.0%qwen3.8-max
Math Comp95.1%gemini-3.8-flash-high95.1%qwen3.8-max
Olympiad92.2%gemini-3.8-flash-high91.2%qwen3.8-max
LiveBench · Data Analysis
Consecutive Events20.6%gemini-3.8-flash-high87.1%qwen3.8-max
Table Join45.3%gemini-3.8-flash-high50.1%qwen3.8-max
Table Reformat96.1%gemini-3.8-flash-high98.0%qwen3.8-max
LiveBench · Language
Connections100.0%gemini-3.8-flash-high94.5%qwen3.8-max
Plot Unscrambling73.4%gemini-3.8-flash-high58.6%qwen3.8-max
Typos90.0%gemini-3.8-flash-high86.0%qwen3.8-max
LiveBench · Instruction following
Paraphrase80.0%gemini-3.8-flash-high73.3%qwen3.8-max
Simplify75.4%gemini-3.8-flash-high67.3%qwen3.8-max
Story Generation82.8%gemini-3.8-flash-high76.5%qwen3.8-max
Summarize87.5%gemini-3.8-flash-high79.2%qwen3.8-max

Sources: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub (CC BY 4.0 (Epoch-run rows)) · LiveBench (2026-06-25 question set, Apache 2.0). Scores are rounded to one decimal; task labels are formatted for readability.

Model specifications: Google and Alibaba Qwen documentation.

Additional pricing source: Google.

Keep reading

Explore AI →

GPT-6 Astra vs Claude Fable 5.1: Flagship Models Compared

GPT-6 Astra and Claude Fable 5.1 share a premium API price. Compare their published math and factual benchmark scores, context limits, and best uses.

GPT-6 Astra vs Sol vs Luna: Which Should You Use?

A practical guide to OpenAI’s GPT-6 family: when Astra’s capability, Sol’s balance, or Luna’s low cost is the right choice, with a direct API price comparison.

Gemini 3.8 Flash: What’s New, What It Costs, and Who It’s For

Google’s September 2026 Flash model brings a million-token input window, multimodal inputs, Search grounding, and lower-cost Batch and Flex options. Here is the practical breakdown.